data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edf88/edf8826f49b356f6e4fee813602f2000d2d09b29" alt=""
Scale is very important in representing something for what it really is. It gives a sense of reality in a model as well as in a draft of what is to come. In celebrating a place for my fairytale artifact, the scale of my artifact helped in assisting me with the width and dimensions for the rest of my model. I knew that I did not need to be too big simply because my artifact was a ring, and it didn't occupy much space. The scale of the Temple of Anon at Karnak is grand in scale to convey masculinity and hierarchy. The scale is also played off of the heavy weight construction. The scale of Pat's Chair gave a realistic representation of how it would be in life size. The Parthenon and the structure's that it inhabit it create unity because they were together to form a city. All though some buildings/structures hold more impotance than others, they are unified in building material and function. The wall construction combined with the location of my artifact also created unity. Individually they needed one another to satisfy the requirement for this project. One without the other would leave it unwhole of ununified. Sections help us understand complex or noncomplex things in a better manner. The artifact/wall section was successful in the way that we represented a corner because it exemplified or focused on one portion of a room or space rather than a whole area. The section plans that were done for Pat's chair emphasized the thickness of the MDF as well as taking a closer look at what the construction really was. The coffee house vignettes remind me of sections as well because instead of trying to capture the whole space, we focused on 3 specific sections or parts.
Through scale, boundaries, and sections we began to create vignettes. Vignettes take all of these elements and exemplify the importance whether it be conveying hierarchy(scale), the limits and spaces(boundary) or the focus on one area(section). With this unity is created.
1 comment:
Hey Kristen, TA Leah here! Leaving some notes for you--
I'm not sure if you need to have citations or not but I'm going to assume yes, so for next time make sure you have those and weave them into the text in a manner that is connected to and supports your argument.
Other than that, in structural terms, be careful about your spelling and grammar. Mistakes were minimal but they were still there. Like Gwen said, put it in Word and have it spellcheck there, then copy-paste. Transitions between ideas within the same sections [ie: scale] need to be worked on-- more fluid and connective.
I thought it was interesting what you said about vignettes having invisible boundaries, and that what you wrote following that had good opportunities to be tied into that idea. What I'm saying is, is the Parthenon a vignette? Why or why not? In the non-literal way you describe vignette/boundary being interconnected, that is. Same with your artifact container.
Post a Comment